Read this before your next flu vaccine
Have you ever wondered why a government agency spends so much time and energy (not to mention tax dollars) trying to convince you to get a flu vaccination every year?
Is it some sort of vague "for our own good" motivation? If so, then why don't we ever hear any government officials urging everyone to take vitamin C supplements?
Why? Because it's all about selling The Shot. And 2005 is no different.
Every year we get an official flu vaccine media blitz from Department of Health and Human services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In fact, the CDC oversees a National Immunization Program (NIP). The motto of the NIP is: "Leading the way to healthy lives."
Healthy lives? Okay, so again: Why aren't these officials urging U.S. citizens to take vitamin C and other supplements that have been shown to help reduce the risk of picking up colds and influenza?
It's simple. The folks at the NIP have millions of vaccine units to move.
According to The Detroit News, most flu vaccines are purchased and distributed by the government. So why in the world would NIP officials promote vitamin C? That job would be the responsibility of those who actually sell vitamin C. The NIP isn't in the vitamin supplement business; it's in the flu vaccine business.
In September, HHS and CDC officials were saying that the elderly, infants, people with chronic health problems and health workers should all get vaccinated. But when it became obvious last month that about 70 million flu shots will be available in the U.S. this season, health officials changed their recommendation to include everyone.
Everyone! Well...not quite everyone. Children under six months of age, those who are allergic to eggs and those who have had poor reactions to flu shots in the past should not be vaccinated, we're told. But for the rest of us: "There is no reason for anyone to delay or to go without their annual flu shot," HHS Secretary Michael O. Leavitt told WebMD Medical News at the end of October.
Well...I can think of at least one reason.
In a February 2005 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, researchers for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases compared flu-related mortality among older people to rates of immunization. Their finding: During the past quarter century, immunization rates for the elderly have climbed substantially while the elderly flu-related mortality rate has stayed the same.
The authors of the research wrote: "We conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit."
"Should I get a flu shot?" That question is a frequent one in e-mails from members this time of year. And while each person has to make the flu shot decision on his own, here are three points to consider:
Point One: Flu shots are not reliably effective (see above).
Point Tw Flu shots contain additives you may not want in your body. In addition to strains of dead flu virus, each shot contains:
You can ask your doctor about the FluMist nasal spray vaccine (which avoids an injection), but it's much more expensive than a flu shot and it contains living flu virus. Squirt a living virus straight into my head? Mmmm...no thanks.
Point Three: The flu shot is designed to prepare the immune system to fight specific virus strains. But you can prepare and strengthen your immune system without an injection of antifreeze by taking these steps:
And you can further prepare with proven immune system enhancers, such as echinacea, vitamins C, E, and beta-carotene; all of which have been shown to help fight colds and flu. Selenium is also an effective flu fighter, as is zinc and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an amino acid that stimulates your body to produce the powerful antioxidant enzyme glutathione.
To find out about other effective ways to enhance your immune system you can read the e-Alert "Fantastic Four" (10/3/05) on our web site at hsibaltimore.com.
...and another thing
What most people don't know about chemotherapy is a lot.
In the e-Alert "Heart of Texas" (10/17/05), I stated that most people don't realize that only nine types of cancer are considered "highly responsive" to chemotherapy.
That comment caught the eye of an HSI member named Robert who sent an e-mail with this question: "What are the 9 types of cancer that are highly responsive to chemo?"
Good question. According to Gordon Zubrod, M.D., (a researcher for the National Cancer Institute), chemotherapy is considered to be highly effective only in these cancers:
Note that I initially had the number wrong: it's 10, not nine. Note also that except for testicular cancer all of these malignancies are rare in adults. Certainly, these are not the only cancers that can be defeated by chemo; it all depends on the type of cancer, how early the cancer is caught, what other measures are taken to treat the cancer, etc.
Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. - one of the leading researchers in alternative cancer therapies - states that when an oncologist speaks of a "response" to chemotherapy, that should not be taken as an implication that "increased survival" is probable. Dr. Moss urges cancer patients to ask these questions before beginning chemo:
Dr. Moss' book, "Questioning Chemotherapy," is available on amazon.com.
To Your Good Health,
"U.S. Now Recommends Flu Shots for All" Todd Zwillich, WebMD Medical News, 10/24/05, webmd.com
"What is Cancer Anyway?" Bill Henderson, Cancer Therapy, cancertherapy.ftherapy.com
This article from www.hsibaltimore.com